This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

The Razer Blade Stealth and optional Razer Core

When it comes to gaming, laptop owners have ever been stuck between a rock and a hard place. Thin and lite systems often portability and convenience, simply limited gaming performance. Larger, desktop-replacement systems offer more than plenty firepower for gaming, only are typically heavy and fall into the category of "transportable" rather than portable. The handful of external chassis that accept been built by diverse vendors tend to have their own limitations and oftentimes require a reboot when changing the graphics mode, or don't support laptop hibernation. They're besides typically tied to either a specific production family unit or even a single product SKU.

XConnect-3

AMD wants to offering mobile gamers a more flexible pick, and it'due south partnered with Razer and Intel to make information technology possible. XConnect is the proper noun of AMD's driver support and implementation using Thunderbolt external graphics.

AMD XConnect: External graphics done correct?

Since we're talking nigh the efforts of iii different companies, permit me pause out which manufacturer contributes what.

AMD-XConnect

AMD wrote drivers for its own Radeon GPUs in order to support an external graphics chassis. Radeon cards running Radeon Software sixteen.2.2 or later on are capable of plug-and-play configuration with an external chassis. The new software can monitor which applications are running on an external GPU and offers the choice to close current applications and prep the organization for safety removal. Dissimilar previous solutions, you can connect or disconnect an external dock without rebooting the system.

XConnect-2

Razer built the first system to support this feature (the Razer Bract Stealth) and is the starting time company to adopt the BIOS extensions and capabilities required to allow for PCI Express hot-plugging. Razer likewise built the first desktop chassis (the Razer Core). Correct now, the Razer Bract Stealth and Razer Cadre are the just compatible products on the market, but that volition change with future launches.

Thunderbolt-External

Intel developed the Thunderbolt 3 standard that makes the unabridged system function and specifically developed the external graphics specification that ties these components together. While external Thunderbolt chassis accept existed for years, these are not necessarily designed for any graphics card and have many of the restrictions mentioned higher up regarding both hot swapping and reboot requirements.

All three companies have contributed their work back into the general Thunderbolt eGFX arrangement, which means information technology should exist much easier for third parties and other vendors to create their own solutions. The x4 PCI Express 3.0 connection isn't as fast as a full desktop slot, no, but it'southward enough to drive gaming with an boilerplate ten% performance striking depending on the title and the GPU.

Gaming-Perf

While these results take been provided by AMD, they're also running on an ultrabook at 1440p. That's strong performance all around.

The ecosystem long-term goal

The mobile graphics manufacture has never developed an ecosystem that allowed for uncomplicated or easy graphics upgrades. While the MXM standard defines a specific pin-out for a graphics card, it does not specify the card size or configuration. Every bit a result, ii MXM cards from two different systems may be practically incompatible with each other depending on the laptop's design.

AMD, Intel, and Razer want to solve this problem by introducing a flexible external standard that bypasses all the heat and thermal issues associated with jamming top-cease graphics cards into modest enclosed spaces. The Thunderbolt eGFX specification isn't limited to big chassis. At IDF last year, Intel demoed external graphics solutions with a wide number of breakout ports and capabilities that were designed with far more small TDP requirements. Our sources have indicated those were all using an early version of Thunderbolt external graphics and were powered by AMD hardware.

If laptop manufacturers and third-party component companies buy into this capability, you lot'll be able to purchase a chassis from whatsoever vendor and use it with whatever laptop that offers Thunderbolt eGFX. While the chassis would even so cost a not-trivial amount of money ($200 to $300 seems a safe bet), the hardware would be upgradeable and compatible with time to come systems. Intel will maintain backwards compatibility in any time to come version of Thunderbolt, which means future systems that utilize a hypothetical Thunderbolt 4 should still exist backwards compatible with a Thunderbolt 3 dock.

Desktop GPUs also tend to exist less expensive than their laptop counterparts and to offer better performance at whatsoever given price point. Over time, the chassis could effectively pay for itself by allowing gamers to utilise less expensive video cards that offer higher overall functioning.

Razer has stated that its dock is too compatible with both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, only Nvidia has stayed adequately quiet about this adequacy. The visitor added hot-plug support in a driver effectually CES, but hasn't said much since. AMD has stated that its XConnect driver will piece of work with the R9 280, R9 285, R9 290, R9 290X, the R9 300 family, and all Fury and Nano products. It will also exist uniform with diverse AMD mobile GPUs and futurity Polaris hardware.

As someone who has covered the mobile industry for years and watched video cards vanish from lower-end hardware, I'grand genuinely excited to see a GPU solution that can meet mobile gamers' needs without requiring them to buy desktop replacements. This standard appears to solve all of the problems that previously held the manufacture back. Will customers seize with teeth? That's another question.